Data Extraction Devices (DEDs) have been used by the Michigan State Police (MSP) for some years. At the present, there is an ongoing investigation regarding its lawful use. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) wants to know precisely how these devices are being used. These powerful devices can obtain almost all information from cell phones. These could include contacts, photos, and yes, even those removed messages.

It is known that DEDs are manufactured by CelleBrite. The company said that among its customers are Verizon, Sprint, AT&T and some other major carriers. Particularly, the technology is used to transfer data when a phone is upgraded. It has also said on its website how powerful the device is. Once plugged in, it can retrieve even deleted and concealed data, and can seize contact lists, images and text messages.

The critics are concerned about how the device is used by the police and not on its intended use by the manufacturer. Taking into consideration that the police force is using it as an investigative tool, the concerned groups want to be sure that there is no privacy violation. The ACLU doubts that there could not be a likely intrusion to privacy during the carrying out of searches. There might be abuses committed by officers merely to obtain information.

The Michigan State Police issued a statement, denying allegations that it is secretly mining out mobile data during traffic stops. To clarify matters, it outlined how officers are going to use the devices. According to the MSP, the officer must either hold a search warrant or gain consent from the holder of the mobile device prior to using the DED. In addition, authority for its use has been given only to a specialty team on criminal matters such as crime against children.

The MSP was pushed to use DEDs because of the continuing increase in the number of crimes using cell phones. DEDs, it said, are effective investigative tools for obtaining critical information from criminals. These are the reasons given by the Michigan State Police for purchasing and using such devices. The devices were acquired by the MSP in 2006.

A government official expressed his approval in setting well-defined limits as to the lawful use of the devices. However, according to him, the limits should not encompass cell phones that are implicated in the commission of crimes. This implies that identified criminals should not enjoy the same benefits of privacy as those of law-abiding citizens.

Worried about your privacy? It’s not just phone privacy you should be concerned about. You should also be concerned about your Internet privacy and use an anonymous proxy to defend it.

Leave a Reply